Hawaii’s Thousand Friends
November 16, 2001
Chairperson Merle Kelai
Commission Members
RE: A00-734 – Castle & Cooke Homes Hawai`i
Inc., & Pacific Health Community, Inc. (O’ahu)
Hawaii’s Thousand Friends opposes the approval of
this district change.
The data I am using
today is based upon a report published by the City and County of Honolulu Department of Planning and Permitting. (Fiscal Year 2000
Annual Report of the Status of Land Use on Oahu).
Population
distribution is a specific concern of the General Plan of Oahu. The policy for population
distribution is set forth in Population Objective C, which provides a table of
percentage ranges which shows the desired distribution of the island’s
population by the year 2010 among the eight Development Plan areas. The percentages are further converted into
population figures in the Appendix of the GP based upon population projections
made by the DBEDT.
The City’s report
contains the following:
1.
Oahu
has lost approximately 15,000 acres of agricultural land since 1975, (even
though the Hawaii Constitution calls for its preservation).
(Table I-1).
2.
Since 1985, Central Oahu has lost over 3,000 acres of agricultural
land. (Table I-2).
3.
As of
June 30, 1998,
the most current data available from the City, Central Oahu actually had 18% of Oahu housing designations (i.e. DP). (Fig. I-B).
4.
As of
June 30, 1998, Central Oahu already had 2614 acres planned for development
without Koa Ridge Makai. (Table II-1).
5.
Oahu General
Plan policy establishes the Central
Oahu percentage of the Oahu population at 14.9 to 16.5%.
The current population (2000) is 16.9% which exceeds even the top of
this range. The City and County
forecasts the year 2025 percentage to be 16.8% based upon currently proposed
developments. Clearly over the top of the range of the General Plan. (Table
II-2).
6.
As of
June 30, 1998, Central Oahu had over 1,500 acres of vacant residential
land. (Table II-3).
There is clearly no
need for increasing urban sprawl in Central Oahu,
and no need for the Koa Ridge Makai development for over 25 years. It is also clearly not consistent with the
General Plan of Oahu.
[back
to see what others are saying]